Artificial Intelligence is here. It’s writing stories, answering questions, recommending books, and popping up in all kinds of tools we use every day. In our libraries and learning spaces, it’s changing the landscape—sometimes in ways that feel exciting and full of possibility, and sometimes in ways that make us pause. As librarians and library folk committed to human-centered, participatory service, it’s time to explore what that means.
In this Choose-Your-Own-Adventure module, we’ll explore together—asking thoughtful questions, experimenting a little, and reflecting a lot. What does it mean when a machine can summarize a novel or create an image from a sentence? How do we center trust, privacy, and inclusion as we navigate these new tools? And most importantly: How do we show up—with intention, curiosity, and compassion—for our communities in a time of rapid change?
The Hyperlinked Library model reminds us that technology should serve people, not the other way around. So in this space, we’ll wonder aloud. We’ll play with ideas. We’ll imagine futures where libraries continue to be places of learning, connection, and care—even (and especially) in an AI-shaped world.
This isn’t about having all the answers. It’s about showing up, together, to explore what’s possible—and what’s right.
Try These:
ChatGPT: https://openai.com
Perplexity: https://www.perplexity.ai/
Current Thoughts:
New_Public is a group of researches and engineers engaged with digital technology. They provide a website and newsletter, but require cookies to access their content. Pro technology. A deck of theirs on the rise of Agentic AI gatekeeping is linked below. Key takeaways are statements that Bots outnumber humans on most social platforms now and that trust has usurped attention as the mode of economy on the internet. Introduces the idea of “thick reputation”. This is ultimately a pitch for “good” use of agentic AI, assuming the inevitability of AI, but proposes an egalitarian, empowering future. The “disclosed human principal” is another key aspect of their presentation.
The Las Vegas-Clark County Library System is developing a comprehensive AI utilization plan from a vision of responsibility and a focus on the patron. Their vision is built on 4 guiding principles:
Customer and Staff Focus – Prioritize a customer-first and staff-centric approach to enhance service quality and operational efficiency.
Security and Privacy by Design – Implement least-privilege access, data minimization, and auditable practices to safeguard sensitive information.
Compliance and Ethics – Ensure adherence to Nevada statutes and ethical standards for responsible AI integration.
Open Governance and Measurable Value – Maintain transparent decision-making and track outcomes like time saved and error reduction.
Digital Literacy AI Utilization Plan, developed for the Las Vegas Clark County Library system.
Articles:
- Pariser & Quicksey & Morelix (2026). After the Feed: Trust, connection, and the next era of social technology. [Not published in a peer-reviewed journal]
- Harvard Business School (2026). The Jobs to be Done Framework. [online blog post]
- Luo, L (2025). How Librarians Are Using Generative AI: Insights from a Nationwide Survey
- Curtin University (2025). 23 Things AI
Heaven, W. (2025). Four reasons to be optimistic about AIs energy usage - Acemoglu & Johnson, (2023). Choosing AI’s Impact on the Future of Work
- Educates (2024). A Framework for AI Literacy
- Northwestern University Library (2023). LibGuide for AI
- Main, C. & Rosengarten, S. (2023). Helping Students Navigate Research With AI Tools
- Beer, J. (2023). Ryan Reynolds Used ChatGPT to Make a Mint Mobile Ad and the Results Were Mildly Terrifying.
- Bowman, E. (2023). A College Student Created an App That Can Tell if AI Wrote a College Essay.
- Dapola, S. (2023). OpenAI’s ChatGPT is seen as a path-breaking AI tool. But experts say that’s far from the truth.
- Fister, A. and Head, A.J. (2023) ChatGPT is Reshaping Information Infrastructures.
- Jackson, J.H. (2023). Chatting with ChatGPT: Deep Dive in Five with Tom Moriarty.
- Lo, L.S. and Vitale, C.H. (2023). Quick Poll Results: ARL Member Representatives on Generative AI in Libraries.
- Pappini, A. (2023). ChatGPT: A Library Perspective
- Sood, A. and Lim, K. (2023). ChatGPT: personal tutor or ‘cheat-bot’? The app that could revolutionise Asia’s learning.
- Shah, C. (2022). The Rise of AI Chat Agents and the Discourse with Dilettantes.
- Bender, E. and Shah, C. (2022). All-knowing machines are a fantasy.
- Mind Matters News (2022). Why We Should Not Trust Chatbots As Sources Of Information.
- Ajao, E. (2022). Four AI trends to look for in 2023.
Twitter Threads:
Funny the @nytimes covered this today, but I had an honest conversation with my students today about #chatGPT. 🧵
— Andrew Piper (@_akpiper) January 16, 2023
The new AI policy in my syllabus.
More on how I am integrating AI into my classes: https://t.co/EsD3MPpyVT pic.twitter.com/QfWRvuNEA5
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) January 18, 2023
Videos:
This page was developed with support from Hyperlinked Library Insights, an AI-enhanced course partner that has been trained on the full content of INFO 287: The Hyperlinked Library, including modules, assignments, and grading criteria. The opening paragraphs were revised by AI.

